Giza Before the Pyramids: PROOF of More Ancient Origins
The reason I’m posting this is to use as a reference, to see if there are any good clues for the Saturn Theory in the ancient images displayed below, because Matt says they are older than the Giza pyramids. The images don’t seem very useful for my research offhand.
Under the video, Matt says:'
If you’ve followed the Ancient Architects channel over the years, you’ll have seen that I’ve produced a number of videos regarding a lost chapter in the history of the Giza Plateau – the time before the pyramids. Watch them here:
• The True Origins of Giza: Cover-up or...
• Giza BEFORE the Pyramids: The Pre-Dyn...
• Older Than the Pyramids? The OLDEST S...
• Sphinx Dating Controversy: Smok...
• Giza BEFORE the Pyramids: The Pre-Dyn...
• Why it's Time to Re-Write the History...
It’s a history that often goes unmentioned, and the artefacts and discoveries that show there was life at Giza before the pyramids often go unseen. It’s like a chapter of history that seems like it’s been purposefully forgotten. It’s like a forbidden history. It seems as though some seem to want to firmly anchor the origins of Giza in the 4th dynasty and there really does look to be an aversion to anything not aligned with that opinion, and I have to say it’s starting to really grate on me. If the evidence is there, why don’t people want Giza to have a longer, more interesting and more diverse history, if there is good evidence to back it up? Surely it just paints a more colourful picture of the past, adding new levels to an already iconic ancient site on earth. The evidence is mounting and the truth is finally coming out: people were living at Giza before the pyramids, and for a long time. And this is not some pseudo-archaeological opinion. In this video, I’ll briefly review the evidence for Pre-4th Dynasty activity at Giza, and then, towards the end of this video, I’ll show you something that most of you will never have seen before, that pretty much proves that Giza had a long history before King Khufu ever set foot on the Giza Plateau.
Lower central image above is similar to the image below by the red dot.
(Above) Matt compares both with monkeys from Giza with one from Saqqara. In my recent paper, Evolution of Religion, I discussed the Master of Animals figure, which seems to have been passed down through millennia to the present day and which apparently was derived originally from the Squatterman figure, or rather from the plasma apparition of it, as shown here.
(Above) In the image by the red dot, the 2 figures I colored orange are said to be monkeys. They appear to be part of the Master of Animals motif, with the Master human figure replaced by a polar column with maybe a lotus flower atop it. In the scene by the blue dot is possibly a monkey I colored blue which has its arms raised like a Squatterman. The bull-headed figure next to it resembles a Squatterman too. I colored its trunk purple to indicate possibly the polar column again.
(Above) In the scene by the yellow dot seems to be 2 or 3 Squattermen.
(Above) In the central scene may be a polar column.
(Above) In the right scene may be a Squatterman with arms raised maybe with a pair of animals on one side instead of on both sides.
(Above) In the right scene, I wonder why 2 birds are inverted. In the middle scene may be a cross.
(Above) In the middle scene may be the Venus eye under an arch.
(Above) In the right scene, the lizard may substitute for the Squatterman.
(Above) In the middle scene may be another lotus flower atop a polar column.