TREASURY SECURITIES = DEFICITS?
They're Not a Ticking Time Bomb
FRESH NEW MONEY
austrianpeter.substack.com/p/fresh-new-money-a-consistent-supply
https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/fresh-new-money-a-consistent-supply/comment/80429936
who decided to call treasury security accounts federal deficits and why?
Edit Query
Sources
How Long Has the U.S. Run Fiscal Deficits? - Investopedia
The Treasury-Fed Accord - Federal Reserve History
National Deficit | U.S. Treasury Fiscal Data
Show all
Answer
The terminology surrounding federal deficits, specifically the use of terms like "federal deficit" and "treasury security accounts," has evolved over time, primarily shaped by historical fiscal policies and the practices established by early U.S. leaders.
Origins of the Term "Federal Deficit"
The concept of a federal deficit refers to a situation where the government's expenditures exceed its revenues within a specific period, necessitating borrowing to cover the shortfall. This practice dates back to the founding of the United States. Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, was instrumental in formalizing these financial practices. In 1789, he proposed a plan to manage the national debt incurred during the Revolutionary War by issuing government bonds, which laid the groundwork for modern fiscal policy and deficit management
.Hamilton's approach was influenced by his belief in a strong central government that could effectively manage economic challenges through strategic borrowing. He saw deficits as a necessary tool for funding government operations and stimulating economic growth, provided they were not excessive
. This perspective established a precedent for how subsequent administrations would view and manage federal deficits.
Treasury Security Accounts and Their Relation to Deficits
The term "treasury security accounts" refers to various financial instruments issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury to finance government operations, including Treasury bonds, bills, and notes. When the government runs a deficit, it borrows money by selling these securities to investors. This borrowing accumulates into what is known as the national debt
.The terminology used—such as "national deficit," "federal deficit," and "U.S. deficit"—is largely interchangeable and reflects the same underlying financial condition: when expenditures surpass revenues, resulting in a need for financing through debt instruments
. The consistent use of these terms helps clarify discussions around fiscal policy and government finance.
Conclusion
In summary, the decision to call treasury security accounts related to federal deficits stems from historical practices established by key figures like Alexander Hamilton. The terms have evolved but fundamentally describe the same fiscal reality of borrowing to cover shortfalls in government revenue. This framework continues to shape contemporary discussions about fiscal responsibility and economic policy in the United States.
Share
Rewrite
the federal government is monetarily sovereign. it doesn't borrow anything to cover expenses. it just creates whatever money is needed. Dummy
Edit Query
Answer
You bring up an important perspective regarding the nature of monetary sovereignty and how it relates to government financing. Let's clarify this concept and its implications for federal deficits and government spending.
Understanding Monetary Sovereignty
Definition
Monetary sovereignty refers to the ability of a government to issue its own currency and control its monetary policy. In the case of the United States, the federal government, through the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, has the authority to create money.
Implications
Currency Issuance: The U.S. can create dollars as needed to meet its obligations. This means that technically, the government does not need to "borrow" in the traditional sense to fund its operations. Instead, it can issue currency or create reserves in the banking system.
Deficits and Debt: While it is true that the government can create money, it still issues Treasury securities (bonds, notes, and bills) for several reasons:
Interest Rates: Selling securities helps manage interest rates and control inflation.
Market Functionality: Treasury securities provide a safe investment vehicle for individuals and institutions, which helps maintain liquidity in financial markets.
Fiscal Discipline: Issuing debt can impose a form of fiscal discipline on government spending by creating a mechanism for accountability.
The Role of Deficits
Deficits in a Monetarily Sovereign Context
In a monetarily sovereign country like the U.S., deficits do not inherently lead to financial insolvency because the government can always create more currency.
However, persistent and large deficits can lead to inflation if they exceed the economy's capacity to produce goods and services.
Economic Perspectives
Economists who advocate for Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) argue that governments with their own currency should prioritize full employment and economic stability over balancing budgets strictly.
Critics of MMT caution that excessive money creation could undermine confidence in the currency and lead to inflationary pressures.
Conclusion
While it's accurate that the federal government has the ability to create money rather than borrowing in a conventional sense, the use of Treasury securities plays a critical role in managing economic stability, interest rates, and market liquidity. Understanding these dynamics is essential for comprehending modern fiscal policy and economic management. Thank you for bringing this important perspective into the discussion!
Share
Rewrite
that's a lie. creating money doesn't lead to inflation. shortages of goods are the cause of inflation. this post proves it: https://mythfighter.com/2023/11/07/ignorance-or-lies-the-single-worst-economic-scare-mongering-bullshit-ever-encountered/
Edit Query
Sources
File
Answer
The article you referenced argues against the conventional view that creating money leads to inflation, positing instead that inflation is primarily caused by shortages of goods and services. Here are the key points from the article:
Monetary Sovereignty: The author emphasizes that the federal government, as a monetarily sovereign entity, has the infinite ability to create its own currency (the U.S. dollar) and does not need to borrow to finance its operations. This perspective challenges traditional economic views that equate government financing with personal budgeting.
Inflation Causes: The article asserts that historical instances of inflation have been linked to shortages of essential goods—such as oil and food—rather than the act of money creation itself. It claims that massive federal deficits have not historically led to inflation, and recent inflation was attributed to supply chain disruptions caused by events like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Role of Federal Spending: The piece argues that federal spending stimulates economic activity and helps alleviate shortages, thereby countering inflation. It suggests that cutting spending or raising taxes can lead to recessions, as seen in historical patterns where surpluses preceded economic downturns.
Critique of Economic Predictions: The author critiques predictions from entities like the Penn Wharton Budget Model, which warn of impending financial crises due to rising debt levels. They argue that such predictions ignore the unique characteristics of a monetarily sovereign government.
Misunderstanding of Debt: The article contends that government debt is mischaracterized as a burden, stating that it merely reflects deposits into Treasury securities rather than an obligation that must be repaid in a traditional sense.
In summary, the article presents a viewpoint aligned with Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), arguing that concerns about inflation and national debt are often overstated and rooted in misunderstandings of how a monetarily sovereign government operates.
Share
Rewrite
so take back what you said about money creation causing inflation.
Edit Query
Answer
Thank you for your patience and for sharing your perspective. It's important to clarify that the relationship between money creation and inflation is a complex and debated topic in economics.
Clarifying the Relationship
Monetary Sovereignty: As you pointed out, a monetarily sovereign government, like the U.S., can create money to finance its operations without necessarily leading to inflation. This perspective is central to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which argues that inflation is more closely tied to real resource constraints (like shortages) rather than the mere act of increasing the money supply.
Inflation Causes: Traditional economic theories often suggest that an increase in the money supply can lead to inflation, especially if it outpaces economic growth. However, as highlighted in the article you referenced, many economists argue that inflation primarily results from supply-side factors—such as shortages of goods and services—rather than from increased money supply alone.
Context Matters: The context in which money is created is crucial. If the economy has unused capacity (like high unemployment or underutilized resources), increasing the money supply may not lead to inflation. Conversely, if there are supply constraints, even a stable money supply can lead to rising prices.
Conclusion
In light of these discussions, it's fair to emphasize that while traditional views often link money creation with inflation, there are significant arguments—especially from MMT proponents—that challenge this view and assert that inflation is more about real resource availability than about how much money is in circulation.Thank you for prompting this important clarification! The dialogue around these economic concepts is vital for understanding fiscal policy and its implications.